
As a federal employee or contractor in Tennessee, you may be dealing with overbearing non-compete clauses, discrimination, harassment, wrongful dismissal, FMLA interference, or retaliation issues. If so, you need a Tennessee federal employee attorney who is familiar with the rights and time limits that are specific to federal employees and contractors.
Michael J. Thompson, Attorney at Law, can provide individualized, knowledgeable advocacy to enforce your rights and resolve your federal workplace issue. We can protect your job, career, and future by working to hold the agency or contractor accountable.
To represent an individual with a federal workplace matter, an attorney should be knowledgeable about agency procedures and the special rights afforded to federal employees. The team at Michael J. Thompson, Attorney at Law, understands state, federal, and administrative courts and procedures. We provide clear communication and quality preparation.
Our firm prides itself on taking the time to thoroughly analyze your matter, being responsive to your inquiries, and treating each client with respect and professionalism. A Tennessee federal employee lawyer from our team can provide counsel and representation to protect your rights when your livelihood depends on it.
Federal discrimination cases are subject to a series of rigid administrative procedures, such as the requirement to contact an EEO counselor from the Equal Employment Opportunity office within 45 days of the discriminatory act or personnel decision.
Employees are often unaware of how quickly these timeframes loom or what level of detail is required in the initial documentation. Early awareness of the administrative process can safeguard your claim and rights.
To be considered harassment in the federal system, unwelcome conduct must be based on a protected category. It must also be severe or pervasive enough to create a hostile or offensive working environment. It can be challenging for federal employees to know where the line is or when to raise concerns. Recognizing those thresholds can help you decide how to proceed.
Dismissals, suspensions, resignations, and demotions in the federal workplace are more likely after an agency investigation or personnel action, like a performance review or disciplinary incident. You should hire a federal employee attorney to explain when these actions are adverse and strategize a response.
Non-compete disputes most commonly arise when federal contractors move between companies. They also occur when contractors transition from private-sector roles into contractor positions on federally funded projects. Traditional non-compete clauses typically do not apply to federal civil service employees.
Most employees may not be aware that the enforceability of these provisions can vary widely by state. Also, there can be different standards for government contractors versus traditional private-industry employees.
It is important to know if the agreement merely restricts certain future employment or work on government contracts or if it can extend to security clearance employment. Scrutinizing the actual terms, along with knowing the limits of what a former employer can actually enforce, can help you make informed decisions about future employment.
The Family and Medical Leave Act provides eligible federal workers with up to 12 weeks of job-protected, unpaid leave. Common problems include:
Many employees do not know their rights until a problem is already present. Being aware of eligibility criteria, required forms, medical certification timing, and return-to-work procedures can prevent many of these issues. Interference with leave, pressure to return early, or treating approved leave as misconduct may be contrary to the statute and subject to challenge.
Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs), investigations, reprimands, and proposed suspensions are common forms of disciplinary and corrective action in the federal workplace. Each can have long-term implications for promotion eligibility, clearances, and future performance ratings. Knowing what each action means, along with the procedures that agencies are required to follow, can be important in deciding how to respond.
Between 2018 and 2023, the National Law Enforcement Accountability Database recorded 4,790 incidents of federal law enforcement officer misconduct, illustrating how frequently investigative and disciplinary actions arise across federal service.
Written notices generally state the expectations, relevant deadlines, and evidence upon which the action is based. Employees can keep a log of communications, request clarification, and document inconsistencies or new evidence.
Early identification of procedural defects, unsupported findings, or vague standards can change the course of a case. These can force an adverse action to be overturned.
Many federal employee law cases in Tennessee are adjudicated through administrative agencies, which have rules and procedures that differ significantly from civil litigation. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission adjudicates discrimination and harassment claims. The Merit Systems Protection Board hears many types of adverse actions. Other disputes may be confined to agency-specific forums.
Which forum a case goes to determines when a complaint must be filed, what types of evidence can be presented, and even what remedies are available. Employees are often shocked to learn that the window for action is sometimes measured in days, rather than months.
According to the MSPB’s FY 2023 Annual Report, administrative judges issued 4,572 decisions, highlighting how frequently federal employment disputes move through this system.
It is important to learn the distinctions between these systems at an early stage. That way, you can make an informed decision about how to proceed. You can also prevent your appeal rights from being inadvertently lost.
Federal employees should be aware that the EEO complaint process starts with contacting their agency’s EEO counselor within a short timeframe. Initial steps include:
Writing down notes, preserving emails or messages, and clarifying desired outcomes can be beneficial before beginning the formal process.
Federal cases may involve notices of proposed action, response opportunities, and possible Merit Systems Protection Board appeals. Procedurally, federal employees must navigate agency-specific rules, timeframes, and standards of review that differ from private-sector processes.
Comprehending these variations can guide federal employees in:
After experiencing harassment or a hostile work environment, employees should start by documenting any repeated or pervasive comments, behaviors, or actions that are unwelcome and based on a protected characteristic.
Reporting to the agency’s EEO office can be an initial step. Maintaining notes on dates, witnesses, and workplace changes is also helpful. Being clear on how the conduct affects working conditions can show whether the behavior constitutes harassment and if formal action is needed.
Federal employees in Tennessee typically start by contacting the EEO office related to their agency. For example, federal employees in the Nashville area can contact the Equal Employment Opportunity Office at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, located at 1310 24th Ave. S., Nashville, TN.
This office processes initial inquiries, counseling requests, and pre-complaint processes for federal employees who feel that their rights have been violated.
Understanding your rights in the federal workplace, whether you are facing discrimination, harassment, leave issues, or restrictions on your contract or pay, can be the first step in protecting your career.
Michael J. Thompson, Attorney at Law, can work with you to weigh your options and decide how to proceed with clarity, precision, and an understanding of agency procedures. Schedule a consultation with our team to learn more.
"*" indicates required fields